Skip to main content
NEW GUIDEFour ways to make a regulated firm AI-nativeGet the deck
Softblues

AI implementation for your business

Make your company AI-native

Put AI to work where it can improve your business. We help you choose a worthwhile starting point, build the investment case, put the right tools into everyday use and check afterwards whether it helped.

Softblues is a London-based AI practice, working with companies internationally.

See the two routes
  • OpenAI Select Partner
  • Google Cloud Select Services Partner
  • Anthropic
    Partner Network member
  • Microsoft
    Member of the Microsoft AI Cloud Partner Program

Where the value is

What would make AI worth the investment?

Start with the work you want to improve and the evidence that would show a difference. These are objectives to test in your own company, not results we have delivered.

Capacity
Time available for work the team cannot get to today. Measure handling time and the review effort behind it.
Commercial value
More work served, or spend that stops. Name the action that would turn capacity into money before counting any of it.
Customer service
Quicker handling with quality held. Measure response time and whether the answer was right.
Quality and control
Less rework and a clearer review trail. Measure errors, exceptions and the checks you keep.

Two routes

Which route fits your company?

Being AI-native means governed AI used in everyday work, with people responsible for review and the business measuring whether it helps. There are two practical ways in, and they join up later.

  • Adopt AI across your company

    For teams that need a practical way to use AI across everyday work.

    Discovery
    What the work is, what it costs today, and the business case for changing it.
    Platform fit
    Which tools suit the work, the data they reach and the controls you need.
    Rollout
    Governed access, prepared sources and training built around your own work.
    Improvement
    A named owner, a monthly review, and a decision about what comes next.
  • Automate a costly process

    For a repetitive workflow with clear inputs, connected systems and review decisions.

    Discovery
    A scoped look at one process: volume, handling time and where it stalls.
    Build
    Integrations and agents where they suit the work, with a person approving what leaves the building.
    Testing
    Run it against real work and compare the result with the baseline.
    Operation
    Monitoring, exception handling and a named owner once it is running.

Not sure which route fits?

The method

How do we decide what is worth doing?

Four stages, each a piece of work with something you keep at the end of it.

  1. Define the change

    The objective, who it is for, and which route turns the gain into money.

  2. Measure the starting point

    Real task volume, time including review, a quality measure and what it costs today.

  3. Compare the investment

    Full setup, running and internal costs, the adoption rate you actually expect, and conservative, expected and upside scenarios.

  4. Review the evidence

    Trial it on real work, compare the result with the baseline, and decide.

Decision
ExpandAdjustStop

Build the case around how people will use the tool, the full cost of the change and the benefit the business can realise.

The calculator is a planning aid built from your own numbers. It is not a forecast of what you would get, and it will sometimes tell you not to build.

Evidence

What does this look like in practice?

Two pieces of work, and it is worth being precise about what each one establishes.

  • Rollout and training delivered

    Key Capital's company-wide Claude rollout

    Key Capital is an Irish corporate finance and investment management firm. Softblues ran the discovery and licensing fit, configured Claude inside the existing Microsoft 365 environment, and led nine weekly training sessions. The rollout went live in April 2026.

    This case describes the rollout and training delivered. It does not report measured time savings, cost savings or financial return.

    Read the case study
  • Running in-house

    The Softblues Claude Operating System

    Softblues runs its own company on Claude: six connected agents, one per function, each with its own operating manual, tools and routines, joined through a shared hub. We use it before we sell it, so we can show it live rather than in a slide deck.

    Our own company, so read it as practice rather than as an independent result.

    Read the case study

More of the work

Photographs on this page are illustrative and do not show any client’s premises. Each card names the stage its work reached.

References

What clients say about working with us

These references are about software delivery and how we work with a team. They are not statements about AI adoption or about a return on one.

  • The team has been very flexible and supportive throughout the engagement. Softblues is great at working with startups; they're very flexible and patient.
    Mae Yip, Founder & Executive, EricMae YipFounder & Executive, Eric
    Softblues profile on Clutch
  • Softblues helped me create our product AutoBI from idea to final release. They set up a highly skilled team that delivered MVP and final version 2x faster than expected. We won a national grant and got enterprise clients for our business.
    Ivan Serov, Co-founder & Partner, AutoBIIvan SerovCo-founder & Partner, AutoBI
    Read Ivan Serov's review on Clutch
  • I was impressed from the very first meeting. They were the only company who brought subject matter experts to initial meetings. They took the MVP to a launchable product, helping us attract more investments.
    Michelle Excell, Co-founder / Chief Product Officer, Voiijer Inc.Michelle ExcellCo-founder / Chief Product Officer, Voiijer Inc.
  • Softblues successfully implemented a design system for our analytics platform with various chart types, from simple bar and line charts to complicated treemaps and nested pie charts. Highly recommend the team.
    Mark Van Winkle, COO, VirtusizeMark Van WinkleCOO, Virtusize
    Read Mark Van Winkle's review on Clutch
  • Softblues has successfully delivered high-quality services in a timely manner and within budget. They communicate frequently and promptly, ensuring an effective workflow. Their honesty and transparency are hallmarks of their work.
    Szymon Dudek, Project Broker, DivanteSzymon DudekProject Broker, Divante
    Read Szymon Dudek's review on Clutch
  • Ivan and his team at SoftBlues have been critical in helping Shift deliver products to our clients. The team has consistently provided great engineering output. I strongly recommend working with Ivan and his team.
    Eric Rowley, Vice President Operations, Shift InteractiveEric RowleyVice President Operations, Shift Interactive
    Read Eric Rowley's review on Clutch

Read our reviews on Clutch

Platforms

Choose the platform around the work

Claude, ChatGPT, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Gemini and custom agents are all routes worth investigating. Which one fits follows from the work you want to change, the data it has to reach, the controls you need and who is going to use it.

Read before you talk to anyone

Latest thinking

Common questions about working with Softblues

What does Softblues help companies do?

We put AI into everyday use inside a business. That is either adoption across the company, where people use governed AI in the work they already do, or automation of one costly process from end to end. We help you work out which is worth doing, what it would cost, and whether it worked once it is running. Softblues is a London-based AI practice working with companies internationally.

Should we start with AI adoption or process automation?

If you can name the process in one sentence, and it has clear inputs and a review step, automation is usually the better first move. If the expensive work is reading, drafting and analysis spread across teams, nobody can name a single process, and broad adoption comes first. The two join up over time, so this is a question about order rather than a choice between them.

Do we need to choose a platform first?

No, and choosing first is the more expensive mistake. The tool follows from the work, the data it has to reach, the controls you need and who is going to use it. Plenty of companies already hold Microsoft 365 licences, which narrows the question without settling it. The platform selection page sets out the criteria if you want to read before talking to anyone.

How do we assess whether the investment is worthwhile?

Measure the work before anyone buys a tool, price the whole twelve or twenty-four months rather than the licence line, and discount the modelled benefit by the share of people who will genuinely use it. Then set cumulative benefit against cumulative cost across conservative, expected and upside scenarios. The business case calculator does that arithmetic from your own numbers, and it will sometimes tell you not to build.

What happens after a discovery request?

You tell us what you want to improve and how the work runs today. We come back to arrange a conversation about your objective rather than about a platform. If a scoped discovery is the right next step we will say so, and if something cheaper would settle your question we will say that instead.

Find your starting point

Tell us what you want to improve. We can discuss which route fits and whether a scoped discovery is the right next step.